Appellate Happenings

Appellate Happenings

Share this post

Appellate Happenings
Appellate Happenings
Last Week in Federal Appeals (No. 44)
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More
User's avatar
Discover more from Appellate Happenings
A weekly summary of and periodic articles about appellate decisions from the federal courts, litigation, and legal writing.
Already have an account? Sign in
Last Week in Federal Appeals

Last Week in Federal Appeals (No. 44)

Appellate decisions from the week of January 9-13, 2022

Ben Reese's avatar
Ben Reese
Jan 18, 2023

Share this post

Appellate Happenings
Appellate Happenings
Last Week in Federal Appeals (No. 44)
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More
Share
Photo Credit: sapto7, Pixabay.com

“The government’s statutory arithmetic starts with a fundamental error: It searches for power in a powerless provision. The proposition that prologues, prefatory clauses, and purpose statements do not confer legal powers, rights or duties is hardly controversial. Courts have recognized as much in interpreting all kinds of legal texts—the Constitution, statutes, congresssional resolutions, and contracts, to name just a few. . . .If ever there were a ‘subtle device’ for conferring vast regulatory power, a general statemetn of purpose surely fits the bill.”

Judge Joan Larsen, Kentucky v. Biden

Decision Summaries

First Circuit

United States v. Melendez-Rosado

The First Circuit held that the so-called “stashhouse enhancement” (USSG Section 2D1.1(b)(12)), which increases an offender’s offense level for sentencing purposes if he maintained a premises for the purpose of making or distributing a controlled substance, can apply even if the premises is also the offender’s place of residence. The panel explained that a building may have more than one principal use, so it did not matter that the premises in this case was also used as a primary place of residence.

Opinion

Sixth Circuit

Kentucky v. Biden

The Sixth Circuit upheld a district court’s order enjoining the Biden Administration from compelling federal contract recipients to implement COVID-19 mask and vaccine mandates. The panel was not persuaded that the text of the relevant statute permitted this sort of requirement and found the government’s other arguments unpersuasive.

Opinion

Westfield National Insurance Co. v. Quest Pharmaceuticals

The Sixth Circuit held that two insurance companies were not required to defend and indemnify a pharamceutical company in lawsuits alleging they acted wrongfully in promoting and distributing prescription opioids. The panel agreed with the district court that these were not lawsuits seeking damages “because of bodily injury,” and thus fell outside the policies’ scope.

Opinion

Ninth Circuit

Johnson v. Walmart, Inc.

The Ninth Circuit held that a class-action plaintiff was not bound to arbitrate his claims related to a lifetime balancing and rotation service agreement. Although Johnson bought his tires online and Walmart’s website Terms of Service contain an arbitration clause, he purchased the service agreement in the store and did not agree to any arbitration agreement when he did so.

Opinion

Tenth Circuit

Citizens for Constitutional Integrity v. United States

The Tenth Circuit rejected a creative attempt to challenge the constitutionality of the filibuster rule and the Congressional Review Act. The plaintiffs focused on the fact that, under the Act, the Senate need only muster a bare majority to disapprove a federal regulation, but it needs 60 votes under the cloture rule to delegate new authority to agencies. The panel found that the plaintiffs lacked standing to challenge the filibuster and rejected their Congressional Review Act challenges on the merits.

Opinion

Eleventh Circuit

Dream Defenders v. Governor of Florida

The Eleventh Circuit left in place a preliminary injunction barring enforcement of Florida Governor Ron DeSantis’s law expanding the definition of “riot” under Florida criminal law in the wake of the Black Lives Matter protests following the murder of George Floyd. The panel noted that the new law’s definition of “riot” was not clear and certified a question to the Florida Supreme Court asking that court to clarify its meaning before the Eleventh Circuit rules on the plaintiffs’ First Amendment challenge.

Opinion


In the News

  • The United States Supreme Court refused to revive a district court’s injunction preventing New York from enforcing its new gun law pending a Second Amendment challenge.


Any opinions expressed here are my own. This article is not legal advice; if you have a legal issue, you should consult an attorney.

If you liked this article or have thoughts about it, please like or comment below (or email me at breese@flannerygeorgalis.com) and consider sharing it with your friends and network.

Leave a comment

Thank you for reading Appellate Happenings. This post is public so feel free to share it.

Share

Share this post

Appellate Happenings
Appellate Happenings
Last Week in Federal Appeals (No. 44)
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More
Share

Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Last Week in Federal Appeals (No. 48)
Appellate decisions from the week of September 11-15, 2023
Sep 24, 2023 • 
Ben Reese
1

Share this post

Appellate Happenings
Appellate Happenings
Last Week in Federal Appeals (No. 48)
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More
Open with a Flash, Not a Fizzle
Avoid the standard "now comes" introduction and start your briefs with a capsule summary, like some of the best appellate judges
May 20, 2021 • 
Ben Reese
1

Share this post

Appellate Happenings
Appellate Happenings
Open with a Flash, Not a Fizzle
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More
4
Last Week in Federal Appeals (No. 40)
Appellate decisions from the week of November 28 - December 2, 2022
Dec 6, 2022 • 
Ben Reese

Share this post

Appellate Happenings
Appellate Happenings
Last Week in Federal Appeals (No. 40)
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More

Ready for more?

© 2025 Benjamin Reese
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share

Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More

Create your profile

User's avatar

Only paid subscribers can comment on this post

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in

Check your email

For your security, we need to re-authenticate you.

Click the link we sent to , or click here to sign in.